Critique articles are academic writings that provide critical evaluations of an article, including a brief overview of the Article. This helps an audience better comprehend and appreciate the Article’s main points, the author’s thoughts, and motivations. There is a sense of how well a piece has been received and its merits and shortcomings if done by a team of professionals like My Assignments Pro.
An article critique must be written in formal language and adhere to a predetermined structure like all academic writing. An introduction, several body paragraphs, and a conclusion are all that is required. Some formatting styles offer distinct criteria for composing an article critique, even though the general structure is different. It is essential to learn how to write a review correctly and be familiar with each formatting style’s requirements. Writers must also have an in-depth knowledge of the subject they are critiquing to create a good critique.
An article critique should accomplish the following goals:
- Describe the main ideas and the author’s intention
- Analyze each critical and exciting point and generate an analysis of the article
- Explain the author’s intention
- Summarise and evaluate the value of an article, stating whether you agree with or disagree with the author, and providing evidence to back up your claim.
The Step-by-Step Guide to Criticizing an Article
Naturally, this type of work is complex and a little puzzling at first glance. When it comes to writing an article critique, it’s understandable that you may become overwhelmed. And, the last thought you might get is My Assignment Help in Melbourne. But, making up your mind for assignment help in Melbourne is to go through a three-step strategy to summarizing and critiquing an article:
Step 1: Reading the Article
The first step in critiquing an article is reading it thoroughly. What are the following questions you need to answer?
- Why is the author regarded as an expert in their field?
- What is the author’s main point or argument?
- It’s essential to know whom the piece is aimed at.
- Is the evidence offered credible?
- What are the author’s viewpoint logical fallacies?
- There are six questions you need to answer before you can answer this one.
Step 2: Gathering Evidence
There are several ways to go about this first step: reading, understanding, and analyzing the article. It’s time to start gathering evidence now that you have a direction in mind for your critique paper. As a starting point, consider completing the following tasks:
1. Assess the Author’s Use of Formal Logic
Some common examples of logical fallacies are shown below, along with brief explanations:
- For example, an author may use an ad hominem assault to denigrate another person’s opinion.
- A slippery slope occurs when the author says that an action will always end in the worst possible circumstance.
- Assuming that activities 1 and 2 occurred sequentially, the author concludes that action two results from action one or only a correlation. Because the author doesn’t investigate deeper to see the underlying reasons and effects of the correlation between the two activities, this assertion is problematic.
- Assumption — when a writer believes something without any evidence to support it. It’s common for someone to believe something because it makes them feel better.
2. In the article, look for any biased opinions that may have been expressed.
3. Consider the Author’s Representations of Other Authors’ Work. Are They Using Inappropriate Political Lenses to View Others’ Perspectives?
4. Verify the list of references used.
5. The language used in the article should be evaluated.
6. In scientific articles, it is essential to question the research methods.
It’s not always necessary; however, while writing an article critique for a scientific piece, you should examine and analyse the author’s research.
To do this, ask the following:
- How is the study organized? Is it free of mistakes?
- How is the research methodology explained in this piece?
- Was there a comparison group in the study?
- There were any problems with the sample size?
- Statistical inaccuracies were found.
- If the experiment was conducted in a lab, is there any way to duplicate it?
- In the sphere of science, does this research (or investigation) make a genuine difference?
Step 3: It’s now time to format your paper!
A well-formatted and well-structured critique paper are no different from any other type of written assignment. Introduction, summary, critique, and conclusion make up the four essential components of an article critique. To assist you to understand how to format an excellent paper here is a simple checklist:
Introduction
- The author’s name and the article’s title.
- The author’s central thesis.
- There should be a clear thesis statement reflecting the direction in which your critique is going.
Summary
- The article’s central point.
- An overview of the article’s main points.
- The article’s final paragraph.
Critique
- Draw attention to both the article’s strengths and flaws.
- Give an informed assessment of the article’s relevance, clarity, and correctness. Provide specific instances from the paper to back up your claims.
Conclusion
- An overview of the article’s most important points.
- Finalize your determination by discussing the research’s applicability.
- To support your claim that the study is significant, explain why future research in this area is beneficial.
Conclusion
If you’re still having trouble writing an article critique despite following these instructions, consider hiring a specialist to handle it for you. Your work can be examined and modified by My Assignments Pro’s My Assignment help in Melbourne, before submission to your professor.
